Posts Tagged ‘Rachel McAdams’

Sherlock Holmes - Minute Movie Review

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Review:

When I first read that Guy Ritchie, the guy behind the vastly overrated gangster comedies Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch, was making a Sherlock Holmes movie that would focus on the action hero aspect of the character, I expected something terrible. But due to great casting (Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law AND Mark Strong? You wouldn’t even need to add Rachel McAdams, I’m in!) and good advance word, I actually wanted to see this film. A big mistake. The film is every bit as horrible as expected, a generic action thriller with nary a good moment. Holmes detecting mostly consists of smelling stuff, hitting men bigger than him and being outsmarted by every second person in the film. There are 60 original Holmes stories, so there really was no reason for the film to create some crazy conspiracy story that barely makes sense and is riddled with plot holes. That Ritchie’s directing is at best mediocre I expected, but it was actually painful to watch how he managed to reduce the great cast to horrible actors. No matter how you feel about the real Sherlock Holmes, avoid this film. How it ever came to be successful is a mystery that would have even intrigued the great detective.

Random Observations:

Sherlock Holmes at the IMDb

Hans Zimmer’s score is nominated for an Oscar. It was certainly very effective in calling attention to itself, but I wouldn’t consider that a good thing. If you notice that the music does not fit the scene, you are taken out of it. Also: who the hell thought that some Irish folk music  would be good for the end credits?

I have to admit that there was one redeeming factor to the film: the exchanges between Holmes and Watson were often quite entertaining. But that was not nearly enough to save the film from being horrible.

There are many more bad things about this film I want to address, but I fear that I might have a heartache if I continue thinking about the film. So for now, be warned to stay away.

Adventskalender 9

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

Klick auf den Link, um das neunte Türchen zu öffnen. Click the link to open the ninth door.

(more…)

The Notebook - Minute Movie Review

Saturday, June 27th, 2009

Review:

In 1940, a debutante and a young man working in a lumbermill fall in love. Seperated by her parents and the war, their love seems doomed. Meanwhile, in the present day, a man reads their story to a woman with Alzheimer’s. The film, based on the bestselling novel by Nicholas Sparks, is a straight-up love story without any real drama since the outcome is known. It has some touching scenes, is beautifully shot and well-acted, but ultimately there is not enough tension to keep the viewer interested.

Random Observations:

The Notebook at the IMDb

I wanted to see the film because I really like the two leads, Ryan Gosling and Rachel McAdams, both of which have done some great work. And they are fine here, but the plot just isn’t enough.

It’s amazing how the production manages to make the two leads look younger in the early scenes. Especially Rachel McAdams doesn’t look a day over seventeen.

I might be suffering from Joss-Whedon-Syndrome and only enjoy stories of doomed love.

The film takes place in South Carolina. I was always under the impression, that segregation was still pretty strong at that time, but in the film almost the opposite is depicted. Of course, most films and books dealing with “the South” tend to romanticize it and gloss over those nasty little details…

There is no way that Rachel McAdams will look like Gena Rowlands when she is old. And the same is true for Ryan Gosling and James Garner.

Minute Movie Review - State of Play

Saturday, June 20th, 2009

Review:

A journalist and a blogger for the respected Washington Globe uncover a conspiracy with the help of the politician which it tries to bring down, who just so happens to be an old friend of the journalist. The film is a pretty clear-cut political/journalistic thriller with all the usual twists and turns. But, refreshingly, instead of a clear moral message it focuses on the importance of journalism and the search for truth. Apart from that, though, there is nothing terribly original about it, making it solid entertainment that is easily forgotten.

Random Observations:

State of Play at the IMDb

The movie is based on a BBC mini-series of the same name.

The lead role of the film is played by Russel Crowe and despite my intense dislike of him both as a person and an actor, I didn’t really mind him all that much in this.

The following will reveal the end of the film, so if you haven’t seen it yet and plan to, you might want to skip this paragraph: I’m not sure whether the final twist was really necessary. Sure, it added a lot of moral ambiguity but in my opinion it would have been much more effective had it happened after the story was printed and the scene with the soldier was just ridiculous and the movie could have done well without it.

In general, the whole plot was a bit too complicated and interwoven to both make sense and be completely believable.

I read that in the mini-series, there was a car chase. Why was there no car chase in the movie? I demand a car chase! Every movie is made better by a bitchin’ car chase.

I never realized how much Ben Affleck sounds like his younger brother Casey. And yes, I put it that way deliberately.

The journalist has a picture of the reporters from the Watergate investigation in his cubicle.

The production company on the film was a GmbH & Co. KG, meaning that it was, for lack of a better word, incorporated in Germany. The film was produced and shot entirely in the United States. Isn’t it great how tax evasion has made films international?