Posts Tagged ‘Mark Strong’

Body of Lies - Minute Movie Review

Saturday, May 22nd, 2010

Review:

In this adaptation of David Ignatius novel, Leonardo DiCaprio stars as the best agent the CIA has in the Middle East. His superior is Russel Crowe, with whom he has nothing in common. While he works with the locals, Crowe personifies American arrogance, conducting his own parallel operations that threaten everything DiCaprio works for. Meanwhile, a new terrorist group has started bombings in Europe and now needs to be stopped, so they do everything they can to do that, with the help of the Jordanian security chief Mark Strong (who is almost as good as usual), while DiCaprio falls in love with an Iranian girl. All this makes for a solid, if unconvincing thriller, that makes the game of international espionage seem almost tedious.

Random Observations:

Body of Lies at the IMDb

What would it take for director Ridley Scott to return to making great films instead of middling ones? Would it be enough if he stopped his collaborations with the most overrated actor of our time, Russel Crowe? Probably not, but it would be a start.

I’m assuming that the budget for this film was quite big, so it’s especially embarrassing to have American Police cars in Amsterdam and Moroccan flags in Jordan. Sure, I wouldn’t shot in the Middle East either, but at least get the set decorations right.

Also: Arabic is not the native language of Iran…

Russel Crowe’s character is exactly how I imagine he is as a person: an arrogant, brash SOB.

Sherlock Holmes - Minute Movie Review

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Review:

When I first read that Guy Ritchie, the guy behind the vastly overrated gangster comedies Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch, was making a Sherlock Holmes movie that would focus on the action hero aspect of the character, I expected something terrible. But due to great casting (Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law AND Mark Strong? You wouldn’t even need to add Rachel McAdams, I’m in!) and good advance word, I actually wanted to see this film. A big mistake. The film is every bit as horrible as expected, a generic action thriller with nary a good moment. Holmes detecting mostly consists of smelling stuff, hitting men bigger than him and being outsmarted by every second person in the film. There are 60 original Holmes stories, so there really was no reason for the film to create some crazy conspiracy story that barely makes sense and is riddled with plot holes. That Ritchie’s directing is at best mediocre I expected, but it was actually painful to watch how he managed to reduce the great cast to horrible actors. No matter how you feel about the real Sherlock Holmes, avoid this film. How it ever came to be successful is a mystery that would have even intrigued the great detective.

Random Observations:

Sherlock Holmes at the IMDb

Hans Zimmer’s score is nominated for an Oscar. It was certainly very effective in calling attention to itself, but I wouldn’t consider that a good thing. If you notice that the music does not fit the scene, you are taken out of it. Also: who the hell thought that some Irish folk musicĀ  would be good for the end credits?

I have to admit that there was one redeeming factor to the film: the exchanges between Holmes and Watson were often quite entertaining. But that was not nearly enough to save the film from being horrible.

There are many more bad things about this film I want to address, but I fear that I might have a heartache if I continue thinking about the film. So for now, be warned to stay away.

Sunshine - Minute Movie Review

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

Review:

Fifty years in the future, after a stellar accident, the sun is dying. The Icarus II is the second spacecraft send to reignite the sun with a big bomb, after the first one failed to deliver the payload. As they enter the last part of their mission, cut off from communicating with the earth, a slow, suspenseful space drama in the best tradition of 2001: A Space Odyseey or Solaris unfolds. And until the last third, the film is nearly perfect, with a well constructed even if slightly illogical story, superb acting and an atmospheric density that makes the offworldly experiences believable. Sadly, the film takes a sharp turn in the last act, when (Spoilers ahead!) the film develops into an Alien-like space horror film. Nevertheless, an ambitious and ultimately rewarding true science-fiction film.

Random Observations:

Sunshine at the IMDb

The film was a commercial and critical flop, despite being by well-liked director Danny Boyle.

It’s really sad to see such a disappointing ending to an otherwise great film. Sure, it doesn’t completely ruin it, far from it, but one can’t help but long for what could have been.

But hey, at least the final scene sort of makes up for it.

Minute Movie Review - Stardust

Tuesday, April 29th, 2008

Review:

Based on the book by Neil Gaiman, Stardust tells the story of Tristan Thorn who ventures into the magical kingdom of Stormhold to retrieve a fallen star for his beloved. But things turn out different than expected when the star turns out to be alive - and a beautiful woman at that. Stardust is essentially a fairy tale for grown-ups - and that is not a bad thing. Fantasy movies have flooded the cinemas in recent years and it is refreshing to see one that doesn’t take itself too seriously, as shown by great supporting performances by Michelle Pfeiffer and Robert De Niro. A bit predictable, the film is nevertheless a lot of fun.

Random Observations:

Stardust at imdb.com

Don’t be put off by the bad special effect shots in the beginning - you will hardly notice them later on.

Charlie Cox in the lead role is a relative unknown, but easily stands his grounds opposite Claire Danes and other renown actresses and actors.

There are actually quite a few changes to the book, from the beginning to the middle to the end. Most of them actually made for a better story though, so they are forgiveable.

Minute Movie Review - Stardust

Monday, November 5th, 2007

Review:

Stardust is a strange movie in that I can hardly find fault with it, yet it is not perfect. It is a nice fantasy tale of, who’d have guessed, love; well made in every aspect and with decent, though not outstanding, acting. Tristan sets out to bring back a fallen star to show his love for a girl wanting to marry another man, but when he discovers that the star is in fact alive (and a good-looking woman…), his journey back gets much more difficult. Witches want the star’s heart to be forever young and the princes of the kingdom seek the jewel that caused her to fall to earth. The story is well-developed and keeps the movie from falling into the trap of becoming just yet another love story. It is not a great movie, but it is a nice one in its own right.

Random Observations:

Stardust at imdb.com

Before seeing the movie today, the only chance to see it in English until the DVD release, I read this article about good books that have been made into not quite so good movies. Of course, Stardust was on it. I haven’t read the book (yet), but I am curious to know what makes the book that much better.

Robert De Niro’s performance was actually a lot better than I expected. Maybe he is getting his old drive to actually try back.

I noticed today that the larger the budget of a movie is, the more people look at you funny when you go to see it alone. I’ve done it often and the last time I got that many incredulous looks was with Crash, even though it was some obscure and small cinema in New York.